Date: 11/07/06
From: John Wallace ()
Date: 11/07/06
If simply voting is the supreme goal here, then I could take my cat to
the polling boot and let her choose who & what to vote for. Better yet,
why bother with spending all this tax money to set up voting stations,
etc..? If a pure vote were the goal rather than having informed people
choose who and what to vote for, then we could simply have a powerball
style "vote" and save the people a lot of time & expense. That way we
could always have random results. What could be more fair & politically
correct? Then even an illegal crack ho sleeping under the bridge could
have a real shot at going to Congress. Heck, it might be better than
what we have now FAIK.
Steven Critchfield wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 15:00 -0600, Joshua Pruitt wrote:
>
>>> TODAY IS THE DEADLINE. [0]
>>>
>>> Please vote.
>>>
>> Addendum: Unless of course you haven't been keeping up, you know nothing
>> about the candidates or issues, and your plan is to simply check all the
>> "D"s or "R"s down the line, or to vote for a particular candidate
>> because he or she "seems nice".
>>
>> In that case, please stay at home or work! :D
>>
>
> There are other issues on the ballot than just the people representing
> us. So go VOTE.
>
> So what if someone doesn't want to educate themselves on the issues and
> decides to vote a party line ticket. Go VOTE.
>
> Just because someone votes a party line ticket doesn't meant they didn't
> know the issues. Go VOTE.
>
> Please do not stay at home or work. Go VOTE.
>
> You may not vote the same as me, but at least you should go and express
> yourself. Go VOTE.
>
> Scare the politicians by increasing the voter turnout. Go VOTE.
>
>
>
-- John Wallace ||-- Send all requests to:
Put your command in the SUBJECT of the message: "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" Quick unsubscribe: <mailto:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : 11/07/06 CST