[nlug] Re: locking down a OpenOffice file

From: Doug Smith (w9wi@earthlink.net)
Date: 11/15/07

  • Next message: t35t0r: "[nlug] Re: Fedora 8"
  • Next message: William Turner: "[nlug] Fedora 8"

    >> >> 2. lock a file so that it cannot be changed
    >>
    >> chmod 555?
    >
    >Readable, therefore copyable, and printable. All chmod 555 accomplishes
    >is a weak ability to maintain that one copy of the file doesn't get
    >changed.

    Yeah, that's why I erased questions 1 and 3 before posting(grin). I certainly concur with the common wisdom that those are not possible.

    As for #2, it depends on how sophisticated the users are and whether you care if modified *copies* of the file exist under different filenames or elsewhere in dataspace. I would suggest chmod 555 would be adequate for a majority of applications - but since we don't know the application in question, it may or may not be adequate here.

    -- 
    Send all requests to:  nlug-request@linuxlists.org
     Put your command in the SUBJECT of the message:
       "subscribe" or "unsubscribe"
    Quick unsubscribe: <mailto:nlug-request@linuxlists.org?Subject=3Dunsubscribe>
    Mailing list archives may be found at: <http://www.nlug.org/mail/>
    **********************************************************************
    This list is from your pals at NetCentral <http://www.netcentral.com/>
    

  • Next message: t35t0r: "[nlug] Re: Fedora 8"
  • Next message: William Turner: "[nlug] Fedora 8"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : 12/02/07 CST